Legal Opinion

Halliday v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 5, 1969No. 642 MPublishedCited by 552 opinions

1Per curiam

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is also granted, limited to one issue: Should petitioner’s conviction be reversed because the United States District Judge who accepted his guilty plea failed to comply with Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure? In our recent decision of McCarthy v. United States, ante, p. 459, we held that when a guilty plea is accepted in violation of Rule 11 the defendant must be afforded an opportunity to plead anew. Petitioner’s plea was entered in 1954. The question we must decide, therefore, is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Johnson v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Linkletter v. WalkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

3Cited by552 opinions

  1. Brady v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
  3. In Re TahlCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Solem v. StumesSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. American Trucking Assns., Inc. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

547 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API