Legal Opinion

Robert John Wolcott v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 11, 1969No. 9992PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MURRAH, Chief Judge.

Petitioner Wolcott pleaded guilty to two violations of the Dyer Act in March, 1966, and was - duly sentenced. About eleven months later, he filed a § 2255 motion to set aside the sentence on the ground that he was not mentally competent to waive his constitutional rights and plead guilty. After a full evidentiary hearing, Judge Brown, the sentencing judge, found that Wolcott was mentally competent to plead guilty and denied relief. On this appeal Wolcott asserts that the trial court was aware of facts at plea and sentencing to sufficiently demonstrate the likelihood of his…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. Pate v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Archibald Lyles v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  5. Duane Earl Pope v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1967

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Robert v. Bruce v. W. J. Estelle, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. Thomas AllenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977
  3. State v. LambSupreme Court of Kansas · 1972
  4. United States v. Marvin Arnesto Crews, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
  5. United States v. Donald F. Bettenhausen and Bernice A. BettenhausenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1974

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API