Legal Opinion
G. S. Suppiger Co. v. Summit Gas & Water Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 1, 1949No. 17,835PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDraper, J.
The appellant operates a canning factory in the town of Mt. Summit. In connection therewith it pumps water from two wells on its premises. The appellee is a public utility which distributes gas and water; to the town and citizens of Mt. Summit. It has no facilities for producing water, but it owns a dwelling house adjacent to the appellant’s factory.
The appellant needed the house for the use of its superintendent and the appellee needed water for distribution to its patrons. On May 19, 1941, they agreed as follows:
“May 19, 1941
“The G. S. Suppiger Company, 1530 Hadley Street, St. Louis,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Thiebaud v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Montgomery v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Barnett v. FearyIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Crystal Ice Co. v. MorrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1903
- Glenn v. BaconCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- A----. B v. C----. DIndiana Court of Appeals · 1971
- Florence Lustig Crossman, A/K/A Florence Lustig, Trading and Doing Business as Florence Lustig v. Fontainebleau Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
- Carsten v. EickhoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
- Fowler v. FARM BUREAU MUT. INS. CO. OF IND.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Norris Avenue Professional Building Partnership v. Coordinated Health, LLCIndiana Court of Appeals · 2015
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.