Legal Opinion

Carsten v. Eickhoff

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided February 26, 1975No. 3-373A33PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStaton, P.J.

The Carstens had a three year lease with an option to renew for ten years which permitted them to remove topsoil, gravel and sand from the Eickhoffs’ farm. Midwest Aggregates Corporation became the Carstens’ sublessee. Removal operations continued several years after the time for renewal had expired when the Eickhoffs gave notice that the lease would be terminated. The Carstens brought an action for a declaratory judgment contending that they were entitled to a ten year term under the option provision of the lease. The Eickhoffs maintained that the Carstens were tenants from year to year.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Link v. Sun Oil CompanyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Lindenborg v. M & L Builders and Brokers, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. McClellan v. AshleySupreme Court of Virginia · 1958
  4. Phar-Crest Land Corp. v. TherberIndiana Supreme Court · 1969
  5. University Realty & Development Co. v. Omid-Gaf, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Wharf Restaurant, Inc. v. Port of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1979
  2. Stewart v. WalkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  3. Arnold v. ParryIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Offutt v. SheehanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. Grenchik v. State Ex Rel. PavloIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API