Legal Opinion

Rose v. . Patterson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 24, 1941PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

In this action tbe plaintiff seeks to bold tbe defendant personally liable for bis claim against tbe estate of A. S. Patterson, deceased, to tbe extent of property received by tbe defendant from tbe decedent. C. S., 59, et seq. Tbe character of tbe action was considered on two former appeals, reported in 218 N. C., 212, 10 S. E. (2d), 678, and sub. nom., Thomasson v. Patterson, 213 N. C., 138, 195 S. E., 389.

Tbe evidence on tbe trial, if inculpatory -at all, points only to a devastavit on tbe part of tbe defendant as executrix of tbe estate of A. S. Patterson, deceased, and not to any…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. . JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  2. State v. . HarbertSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Green v. . BiggsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  4. State Ex Rel. Thomasson v. PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
  5. State v. . FranklinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Moore v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Wilkins v. Commercial Finance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Rogers v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API