Rogers v. . Hall
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
This appeal poses one question for decision: Does the assignment of a lease contract breach a covenant therein not to sublet without the consent of the lessor? We are constrained to answer in the negative.
A covenant not to assign and a covenant not to sublet have the same general objective — the restriction of the common law right of alienation. Even so, they are by no means coextensive. Each has a distinctive meaning. Springs v. Refining Co., 205 N. C., 444, 171 S. E., 635; Millinery Company v. Little-Long Company, 197 N. C., 168, 148 S. E., 26; Hargrave v. King, 40 N. C., 430; Oil Co. v.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Whichard v. LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Whichard v. . LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Peoples v. FulkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Peoples v. . FulkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Coley v. . DalrympleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Isbey v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
- Fairchild Realty Co. v. Spiegel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Fairchild Realty Co. v. Spiegel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Outer Banks Ventures, Inc. v. Currituck Cnty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026