Legal Opinion

Rogers v. . Hall

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 30, 1947PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

This appeal poses one question for decision: Does the assignment of a lease contract breach a covenant therein not to sublet without the consent of the lessor? We are constrained to answer in the negative.

A covenant not to assign and a covenant not to sublet have the same general objective — the restriction of the common law right of alienation. Even so, they are by no means coextensive. Each has a distinctive meaning. Springs v. Refining Co., 205 N. C., 444, 171 S. E., 635; Millinery Company v. Little-Long Company, 197 N. C., 168, 148 S. E., 26; Hargrave v. King, 40 N. C., 430; Oil Co. v.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Whichard v. LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Whichard v. . LipeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  3. Peoples v. FulkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Peoples v. . FulkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  5. Coley v. . DalrympleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Isbey v. CrewsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Fairchild Realty Co. v. Spiegel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  3. Fairchild Realty Co. v. Spiegel, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  4. Outer Banks Ventures, Inc. v. Currituck Cnty.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API