Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Thomasson v. Patterson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1938PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.

The defendant, in demanding a removal of this cause to Swain County as a matter of right, relies upon C. S., 465, in which it is provided that: “All actions upon official bonds or against executors and administrators in their official capacity must be instituted in the county where the bonds were given, if the pi’incipal or any surety on the bond is in the county; if not, then in the plaintiff's county.”

This section seems to be incomplete in its terms. It provides that all actions upon official bonds, or against executors and administrators in their official capacity, must be instituted in…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Commissioner of Insurance v. North Carolina Automobile Rate Administrative OfficeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  2. State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2017
  3. Wiggins v. FinchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  4. Rose v. . PattersonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API