Legal Opinion
Attorney General v. Public Service Commission
Michigan Court of Appeals
Decided September 24, 1987No. Docket Nos. 95494, 95495PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Per curiam
The Detroit Edison Company appeals as of right from the Ingham Circuit Court’s order affirming an order of the Michigan Public Service Commission. Although Detroit Edison raises eight issues on appeal, the basis of most of *233its arguments is that the interest it must pay on customer refunds is excessive. We affirm the order of the psc.
This case began in 1975 when the psc ordered that Detroit Edison could not impose a surcharge upon its customers to recover fuel costs. The order was eventually upheld. Detroit Edison Co v PSC, 82 Mich App 59; 266 NW2d 665 (1978), lv den 403 Mich 823 (1978), lv…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moore v. SpanglerMichigan Supreme Court · 1977
- Associated Truck Lines, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1966
- Detroit Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978
- Detroit Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1982
- Detroit Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986
3Cited by37 opinions
- Attorney General v. Public Service Commission No 2Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
- Consumers Power Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1991
- Midland Cogeneration Venture Ltd. Partnership v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
- Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
- Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.