Legal Opinion

Detroit Edison Co. v. Public Service Commission

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1982No. Docket Nos. 61294, 61295. (Calendar No. 4)PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFitzgerald, C.J.

(for affirmance). In our order granting leave to appeal, we stated as the first issue whether "the charge allowed by the fuel cost adjustment clause [is] a charge to recover past costs, or a charge based on past experience reflected in a current charge”. 1 The answer to this question is decisive in resolving all of the issues presented in this case.

The cornerstone of the position taken by Edison, and accepted by the opinion for reversal, is that the FCAC adopted in February 1974 was intended' to impose a fuel adjustment in the billing month to recover fuel costs incurred two months before. If…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Montana-Dakota Utilities Co. v. Northwestern Public Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. State Ex Rel. Utilities Commission v. EdmistenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. General Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1954
  5. Detroit Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Union Carbide Corp. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Matanuska Electric Ass'n v. Chugach Electric Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2002

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API