Legal Opinion

Detroit Edison Co. v. Public Service Commission

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 20, 1978No. Docket 30365, 30366PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Martin, J.

These cases present "simple” "complex” issues. The parties agree on the facts but labelled events or procedures differently to arrive at disparate legal conclusions.

Let us detail the factual situations.

On September 20, 1973 Detroit Edison, Case No. U-4426, applied to the Michigan Public Service Commission for authority to include a fuel adjustment clause (FCAC) in residential rate schedules as permitted by MCLA 460.6a (2); MSA 22.13(6a) (2). The Attorney General intervened.

On February 4, 1974 in U-4426 the MPSC found the company "proposed to amend its electric rate schedules * * * to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  2. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Michigan Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1946
  4. City of Detroit v. Michigan Public Utilities CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1939
  5. General Telephone Co. v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1954

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Utility Consumers Council of Missouri, Inc. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  2. Public Service Company of New Hampshire v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, New Hampshire Electric Cooperative, Inc., Towns of Ashland and Wolfeboro, New Hampshire Village Precinct of New Hampton, New Hampshire, Intervenors. Appalachian Power Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Appalachian Power Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Cities of Bedford, Intervenors. Pennsylvania Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc., Intervenor. Metropolitan Edison Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission, Boroughs of Kutztown, Goldsboro & Lewisberry, Pennsylvania, Allegheny Electric Cooperative, Inc., IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  3. Attorney General v. Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. Great Lakes Steel Division of National Steel Corp. v. Michigan Public Service CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  5. Railroad Commission v. High Plains Natural Gas Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API