Marshall v. Marshall
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
GARDNER, Chief Justice.
This cause was submitted for final decree on the bill, decree pro confesso against defendant and upon the evidence noted. The Chancellor granted complainant a divorce from her husband on the ground of adultery alleged in paragraph 3 and established a resulting trust in an one half interest in the house upon the averments of paragraph 4 and the proof in support of these paragraphs.
Any amendable defects in the bill were waived by failure to interpose demurrer. Wakefield v. Wakefield, 217 Ala. 517, 116 So. 685. True, in order to sustain the decree no essential fact is to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Montgomery v. McNuttSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
- Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
- Wakefield v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
- National Building & Loan Ass'n v. BallardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1899
- Browder v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Owens v. OwensSupreme Court of Alabama · 1967
- Roubicek v. RoubicekSupreme Court of Alabama · 1945
- Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- Adams v. GriffinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
- Darden v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.