United States v. Seivers
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT ON FURTHER REVIEW AND ACTION ON PETITION FOR NEW TRIAL
JONES, Senior Judge:
This case is again before us for review under Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866. Upon prior review this Court found service-connection lacking and determined that the court-martial had no jurisdiction over the offense.1 The Judge Advocate General certified the service-connection question to the United States Court of Military Appeals. That Court concluded that service-connection was present and that the court-martial had jurisdiction. It reversed this Court’s deci*614sion and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. GrundenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
- United States v. JamesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1978
- United States v. SeiversUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- De War v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
- United States v. GuilfordU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. NeeleyU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1985
- Mendrano v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986
- Mendrano v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1986