Legal Opinion
Mendrano v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 31, 1986No. 84-1735PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Chief Judge.
In this habeas corpus proceeding, petitioner-appellant Jaime B. Mendrano, a discharged army private incarcerated in the United States Disciplinary Barracks at Fort Leavenworth, Kansas, challenges his convictions for premeditated murder and lewd and lascivious conduct with respect to one woman, and rape with respect to another. He asserts that his trial violated his Sixth Amendment right to jury trial and “to a fair and impartial jury,” and his Fifth Amendment due process rights because Article 52(a)(2) of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ), 10 U.S.C. §…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Williams v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Johnson v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Apodaca v. OregonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Burns v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Alvin W. Dodson, Jr. v. Colonel Gordon N. Zelez, CommandantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Solomon Monk, Also Known as David L. Martin v. Colonel Gordon N. Zelez, CommandantCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Sanford v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- Rafi Dhakaa Khan v. Col. William L. HartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Roger J. Lundy v. Gordon N. Zelez, Commandant, U.S.D.B.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.