Legal Opinion
Bhagwanani v. Howard University
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 17, 2005No. CIV.A.03-714(JDB)PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BATES, District Judge.
On March 21, 2003, defendant Howard University removed this action concerning a dispute over an employment contract from the Superior Court of the District of Columbia to federal court. Shortly thereafter, plaintiff Sundri Bhagwanani filed a motion to remand the action to Superior Court, arguing that the lone count on which Howard University premised its removal — a count alleging a District of Columbia law conspiracy to violate the Thirteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution — did not give rise to a question of federal law sufficient to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Griffin v. BreckenridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Breakman v. AOL LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Downey v. Ambassador Development, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- John Roe I v. Bridgestone Corp.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2007
- Doe v. SiddigDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Zuckman v. Monster Beverage CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.