Legal Opinion
Zuckman v. Monster Beverage Corporation
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 6, 2013No. Civil Action No. 2012-1978PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JOHN D. BATES, District Judge.
Plaintiff Michael S. Zuckman, acting on behalf of himself and the general public, filed this action in District of Columbia Superior Court on November 13, 2012. Zuckman alleges that Monster Beverage Corporation (“Monster”) engaged in unlawful trade practices in violation of the District of Columbia Consumer Protection Procedures Act (“DCCPPA”) by failing to disclose and by misrepresenting the. adverse health effects of Monster Energy drinks. Monster removed the action, arguing that this Court has diversity jurisdiction over the matter pursuant…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Allapattah Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- City of Riverside v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- National Consumers League v. Flowers Bakeries, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. Hormel Foods CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- National Consumers League v. Bimbo Bakeries USADistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Breathe Dc v. Santa Fe Natural Tobacco CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Inst. for Truth in Mktg. v. Total Health Network Corp.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.