Legal Opinion
Doe v. Siddig
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 12, 2011No. Civil Action 10-1256 (CKK)PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jane Doe 1 brings this action against Defendants Safwat Hassan Siddig (“S. Siddig”) and Kawthar Hassan Suliman, a.k.a. Kawthar Siddig, asserting a variety of claims in connection with her nineteen years of employment in Defendants’ household as a self-described domestic servant and nanny. Presently before the Court is Defendants’ [18] Motion to Dismiss Pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (“Motion to Dismiss”). Upon consideration of the parties’ submissions, the relevant authorities, and the record…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Elat v. NgoubeneDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2014
- Velez v. SanchezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2012
- Aguirre v. Best Care Agency, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Alexander v. Southeastern Wholesale Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 2013
- Chien v. SullivanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.