Legal Opinion
Medinol Ltd. v. Guidant Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided February 15, 2006No. 03 Civ. 2604(SAS)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SCHEINDLIN, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Medinol Ltd. (“Medinol”) brings this action for damages and injunctive relief relating to the alleged infringement by Gui-dant Corp. and its subsidiary Advanced Cardiovascular Systems, Inc. (collectively, “Guidant”) of certain of Medinol’s patents. 1 Medinol moves for summary judgment based on literal infringement of two of the three patents-in-suit, the ’120 Patent and the ’381 Patent. Guidant responds with its own motion for summary judgment, asserting that the accused products infringe none of the patents-in-suit, either literally…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Warner-Jenkinson Co. v. Hilton Davis Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Medisim Ltd. v. Bestmed LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- TOWN & COUNTRY LINEN CORP. and TOWN & COUNTRY HOLDINGS, INC. v. INGENIOUS DESIGNS LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2022