Legal Opinion
McNeil-PPC, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided July 27, 2006No. 05 Civ. 1321(WHP)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
PAULEY, District Judge.
McNeill-PPC, Inc. (“McNeil”), Merck & Co., Inc. and Johnson & Johnson- Merck Consumer Pharmaceuticals Co. (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) bring this action pursuant to the Hatch-Waxman Act, 35 U.S.C. § 271(e)(2), against Perrigo Company, L. Perrigo Company and Perrigo Research & Development Company (collectively, the “Defendants” or “Perrigo”). Plaintiffs accuse Perrigo of infringing U.S. Patent No. 5,817,340 (the “'340 patent”) by filing Abbreviated New Drug Application (“ANDA”) No. 77-355 with the United States Food and Drug Administration (the…
2Cases cited86 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- McNeil-PPC, Inc. v. Perrigo Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- CELGENE CORPORATION v. HETERO LABS LIMITEDDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Chrisha Creations, Ltd. v. Dolgencorp, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Heron Therapeutics, Inc. v. Azurity Pharmaceuticals, Inc.; Azurity Pharmaceuticals India LLP f/k/a Slayback Pharma India LLP; and Slayback Pharma LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- Lashify, Inc. v. Qingdao Network Technology Co., Ltd. a/k/a Qingdao Follow the Trend Network Technology Co., Ltd. a/k/a Qingdao Mars Culture Media Co., Ltd. d/b/a UCoolMe and Vivicute LimitedDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2026