Legal Opinion
Nathanson v. Polycom, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided April 3, 2015No. Case No. 13-3476 SCPublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTIONS TO DISMISS
SAMUEL CONTI, District Judge
I. INTRODUCTION
Now before the Court are two motions to dismiss Plaintiffs first amended complaint (“FAC” or “Complaint”), ECF No. 47, in this securities fraud case. The first motion to dismiss was filed by Defendants Polycom, Inc. and Polycom’s last two Chief Financial Officers (“CFOs”), Michael Kourey and Eric Brown. ECF No. 51 (“Polycom Mot.”). Collectively the Court will refer to these Defendants as “the Po-lycom Defendants.” The second motion to dismiss was filed by Defendant Andrew Miller, Polycom’s…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Starr v. BacaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Retail Wholesale & Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund v. Hewlett-Packard Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Gerritsen v. Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
- In re Galena Biopharma, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2015
- In re Key Energy Services, Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2016
- Abadilla v. Precigen, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2022
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.