Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided December 10, 2004No. 04-0208/ARPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge ERDMANN

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Specialist Keith L. Williams, Jr., was charged with two specifications of larceny, seven specifications of forgery and one specification of wrongfully opening mail, in violation of Articles 121, 123 and 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. §§ 921, 923 and 934 (2000) respectively. Williams submitted an offer to plead guilty. The convening authority accepted the offer and the parties entered into a pretrial agreement.

At trial the military judge allowed the Government to withdraw from the pretrial agreement. Williams subsequently…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
  2. United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
  3. United States v. AcevedoCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
  4. United States v. FelderCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  5. Satterfield v. DrewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. United States v. KruseNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  2. United States v. DeanCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
  3. United States v. KruseNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2016
  4. In re: United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
  5. In re: United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API