Legal Opinion

United States v. Dean

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

Decided March 12, 2009No. 08-0431/ARPublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judge ERDMANN

delivered the opinion of the court.

Private Richard M. Dean was charged with arson, larceny, making a false official statement, and burglary. The parties entered into a pretrial agreement that did not include a misconduct provision authorized in Rule for Courts-Martial (R.C.M.) 705(c)(2)(D). On the eve of trial, the convening authority withdrew from the pretrial agreement because Dean would not agree to modify the stipulation of fact to include new acts of alleged misconduct. Dean moved to compel enforcement of the pretrial agreement. The military judge conducted a hearing and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Shepardson v. RobertsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  2. United States v. HunterCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2008
  3. United States v. KoopmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
  4. United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
  5. United States v. ManleyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Specialist BENJAMIN C. HILLArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2012
  2. In re: United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
  3. In re: United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2025
  4. United States v. ShookUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2011
  5. United States v. Specialist CHARLES E. ROBINSON IIIArmy Court of Criminal Appeals · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API