United States v. Acevedo
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
1Opinion of the Court
Chief Judge COX
delivered the opinion of the Court.
I
Two issues for review are presented in appellant Acevedo’s case. The first one questions the meaning and effect of a provision of appellant’s pretrial agreement pertaining to punitive discharge. In essence, the agreement indicated that, if a dishonorable discharge was adjudged, the convening authority would have to suspend it. The agreement did not specify that a bad-conduct discharge, if adjudged, would be similarly suspended, and indeed a bad-conduct discharge was adjudged. Accordingly, the convening authority approved the discharge as…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- Edmond v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. GreenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1976
- Ralph Henry Cooper v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. KingUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1977
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- United States v. LundyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2006
- United States v. SpaustatCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- United States v. RockCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1999
- United States v. SmeadCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2009
- United States v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2004
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.