Legal Opinion

Bear Mill Mfg. Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided July 5, 1938No. 305PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge.'

The petitioner, Bear Mill Manufacturing Company, Inc., was incorporated in 1907 under the laws of the State of New York. For many years before, a partnership, of which* it was the successor, bore the same name. Neither it, nor its predecessor, was strictly a manufacturer, nor did either own or operate a mill or factory. They purchased unfinished cotton or rayon goods, had them sent to another concern which they did not own, control or operate, for finishing, bleaching, dyeing, or printing and then sold them to be made up into garments. The petitioner is…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Royal Milling Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Pure Silk Hosiery Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Mid West Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Herzfeld v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  2. Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945
  3. Elliot Knitwear, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  4. Elliot Knitwear, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  5. Jacob Siegel Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1945

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API