Legal Opinion

United States v. Claxton

U S Coast Guard Court of Military Review

Decided May 11, 1992No. CGCM 0006; No. 902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAUM, Chief Judge:

This Court initially reviewed this case in 1989. At that time, we affirmed the findings of guilty, set aside the sentence, ordered a sentence rehearing and directed restoration of all rights, privileges and property of which the accused had been deprived by virtue of the sentence. We reiterated that action upon reconsideration and the U.S. Court of Military Appeals ultimately affirmed our decision. U.S. v. Claxton, 29 M.J. 667 (C.G.C.M.R.1989), aff'd on reconsideration 29 M.J. 1032 (C.G.C.M.R.1990), aff'd, 32 M.J. 159 (C.M.A. 1991).

*1113Thereafter, the record was returned to the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Freytag v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. United States v. AllenUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  3. United States v. ClaxtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  4. Boudreaux v. United States Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military ReviewUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1989
  5. United States v. GrafU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1990

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. CoffeyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. GrayU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  3. Al Bahlul v. United StatesSpecial Court under the Regional Rail Reorganization Act · 2019
  4. United States v. BridgesU S Coast Guard Court of Criminal Appeals · 2005
  5. In Re. JordanNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API