Edwards v. Hellings
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court;
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
This purports to he an action upon a judgment. The complaint was demurred to upon the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action, and also as ambiguous, uncertain, etc. The demurrer was overruled; and defendants refusing to answer, judgment was entered for plaintiff. W. B. Hellitigs, one of the defendants, appeals. •
The general demurrer should have been sustained for the complaint does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action upon a judgment. The only averment in the complaint about a judgment is as follows: “That on the 21st of June,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Weller v. DickinsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. EscobarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Tracy v. MacIntyreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Clark v. NordholtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
- Browne v. UlrichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948