Legal Opinion

Browne v. Ulrich

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 23, 1948No. Civ. No. 16209Published

1Opinion of the Court

BARTLETT, J. pro tem.

This is an action to foreclose a lien: The complaint contains the following allegations:

Paragraph I alleges that certain persons are sued under fictitious names.

Paragraph' II alleges that the defendant Bank of America National Trust and Savings Association is a national banking association.

Paragraph III alleges that the defendants Ulrich and Jorgenson are the owners of certain described real estate.

Paragraph IV alleges that the defendant Bank of America claims some interest in the property and that the claim is without right.

Paragraphs V, VI and VII read as follows:

“V
“That…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Burns v. HiattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. McPheeters v. McMahonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Sullivan v. ComptonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  4. Edwards v. HellingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API