Legal Opinion
United States v. Monroe Service Company
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided May 3, 1990No. 88-3230PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLAUM, Circuit Judge.
This dispute, between Monroe Service Company (“Monroe”) and the Farmers Home Administration (“FmHA”), arose from the parties’ conflicting interest in the 1985 crops grown by James and Mary Ellen Zieger and sold by the Monroe County Sheriff on November 6, 1985, for $22,742. Monroe, which had no security interest in the crops, levied on the crops pursuant to a default judgment. FmHA, which had a perfected security interest, now sues Monroe for conversion of the crops. After a bench trial, judgment was entered in favor of FmHA. We affirm.
I
During 1981, James P. Zeiger and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Chase National Bank v. City of NorwalkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Michele Portmann, Doing Business as Grafica, an Individual v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Mid-America Fire & Marine Insurance v. MiddletonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- In the Matter of Vincent Lapiana and Barbara Lapiana, Debtors. Appeal of Millard G. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
- In Re Dakota Industries, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. South Dakota · 1991
- Thomas Robert Stimac v. United States Department of Justice, Agent Conway, Agent FincherCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1990
- United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991