Legal Opinion
United States v. John Doe
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided August 2, 1991No. 89-3071PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.
In this criminal appeal, we must decide under what circumstances, if any, the United States is required to file a motion for correction of sentence under Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) (“Rule 35(b)” and “Rule”). In May 1988, John Doe (“Doe”)1 was convicted in the Northern District of Illinois of two counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine and one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine, see 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 846. He did not appeal his conviction. Within one year of sentencing, however, he moved the District Court to order the United States, based…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gozlon-Peretz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- United States v. Julio La Guardia, United States of America v. Eredia Josefa Jimenez-MinallaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- United States v. Jeffrey C. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Paul T. Krispin, Jr. v. The May Department Stores Company, Scott Matheis, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. The May Department Stores Company, Doing Business as Famous-Barr Co., Paul T. Krispin, Jr. v. The May Department Stores CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Frank GangiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- In Re Sealed Case No. 97-3112Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1999
- United States v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.