Legal Opinion
Honess 52 Corp. v. Town of Fishkill
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 6, 1998No. 97 Civ. 6724 (WCC)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
WILLIAM C. CONNER, Senior District Judge.
This civil rights action arises out of a dispute between plaintiff Honess 52 Corp. and the Town of Fishkill (the “Town”), the Town Board of the Town of Fishkill (the “Town Board”), and the Planning Board of the Town of Fishkill (the “Planning Board”) — collectively, the “Defendants”— over development of property owned by Plaintiff (the “Property”). In its complaint, Plaintiff alleges that the defendants arbitrarily and capriciously deprived it of a constitutionally protected property interest in violation of its substantive due process…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Iglesias-Mendoza v. La Belle Farm, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2007
- Goldfine v. KellyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Homefront Organization, Inc. v. MotzDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2008
- Sunrise Development, Inc. v. Town of HuntingtonDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Country View Estates @ Ridge LLC v. Town of BrookhavenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.