Legal Opinion

Ingold v. AIMCO/Bluffs, L.L.C. Apartments

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 29, 2007No. 06SA240PublishedCited by 43 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Eid

This case concerns an arbitration clause in an apartment lease entered into between Plaintiffs Chris and Cindy Ingold and one of the Defendants, Boulder Creek Apartments. We issued a rule to show cause to review the trial court's order compelling the Ingolds to arbitrate their claims against Boulder Creek Apartments as well as its parent company, Defendant AIMCO/Bluffs LLC, and its employee, Defendant James R. Macias (collectively, the "Defendants"). We make the rule absolute in part, discharge it in part, and remand with directions.

I

For purposes of this proceeding the factual allegations set…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  5. Vasquez v. HillerySupreme Court of the United States · 1986

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by43 opinions

  1. DTC Energy Grp., Inc. v. HirschfeldCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
  2. Warne v. HallSupreme Court of Colorado · 2016
  3. Barnett v. Elite Properties of America, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  4. Carruthers v. Carrier Access Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Carl's Italian Restaurant v. Truck Insurance ExchangeColorado Court of Appeals · 2007

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API