State v. Ingram
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion,
BISHOP, J.
The defendant, John Ingram, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered after a jury trial, of attempt to commit assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (l).2 He claims that (1) the evidence did not establish his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt and (2) the court improperly instructed the jury on the intent element of the crime.3 We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The jury reasonably could have found the following facts. At some time during the evening of Friday, November 13,1998, the defendant entered the Kentucky *248Fried Chicken…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- State v. AponteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- State v. JenkinsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. WestberryConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State v. KoslikConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004
- State v. EspositoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004