Legal Opinion

State v. Aponte

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided February 26, 2002No. SC 16546PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

NORCOTT, J.

The principal issue in this certified appeal is whether the trial court’s instructions to the jury improperly imposed on the jury a mandatory presumption, thereby shifting the burden of proof from the state to the defendant and depriving the defendant of a constitutionally fair trial. Although the trial court’s instructions contained language that we have used in the past, the defendant claims that this language was improper in light of the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S. Ct. 2450, 61 L. Ed. 2d 39 (1979).

The defendant,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. State v. HintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
  4. State v. DenbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  5. State v. StankowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. State v. LedbetterSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  3. State v. WhitfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
  4. State v. BetancesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  5. State v. DiazSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API