Legal Opinion

Elzie v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided December 19, 1917No. 9227PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Conviction of misdemeanor; from Forsyth, superior court— Judge Morris. September 21, 1917.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

1. In tiie brief of -the plaintiff in error it is conceded that the judge properly overruled the demurrer to the indictment; and this eliminates from the cáse all questions raised by the demurrer.

2. “Objection that a sentence imposed in a criminal case is for any reason illegal or irregular can not be made the ground of a motion for a new trial.” Martin v. City of Borne, 15 Ga. App. 496 (83 S. E. 872); Hill v. State, 122 Ga. 166 (2) (50 S. E. 57); Sturkey v. State, 116 Ga. 526 (42 S. E. 747); Bellinger v. State, 116 Ga. 545 (2) (42 S. E. 747); Burgamy v. State, 114 Ga. 852 (2) (40 S. E. 991).

3…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cason v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1914
  2. Gaskins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  3. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  4. Bellinger v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  5. Burgamy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  2. Sable v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  3. McLeod v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
  4. Varner v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API