Hill v. State
Supreme Court of Georgia
Indictment for seduction. Before Judge Bartlett. Polk superior court. January 9, 1905.
1Opinion of the CourtEvans, J.
The ruling announced in the first headnote is in accord with the decision rendered in Jordan v. State, 119 Ga. 443 (6), 445-6. The question of practice dealt with in the second headnote has long since been definitely settled. Hardison v. State, 95 Ga. 338 (5); Bellinger v. State, 116 Ga. 545 (3), and cases cited. The conviction of the accused of the offense of seduction was, we think, warranted by the evidence, iron* which the jury could have found the following state of facts: The accused was employed to work on the farm of one West, and resided at his house. The father of the prosecutrix…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Jordan v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- O'Neill v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1890
- Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1892
- Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1877
- Bellinger v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
3Cited by13 opinions
- Seaboard Air-Line Railway Co. v. BentonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1931
- Sable v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Fears v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Guthrie v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
- Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.