Legal Opinion

Shreffler v. Morris

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 13, 1971No. [No. 433, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSingley, J.

For the third time, Rule 542 of the Sixth Judicial Circuit, which imposes a limit on the time within which a civil case may be removed, is under fire. We flanked a similar attack in Smith v. Fredericktown Bank & Trust Co., 258 Md. 141, 265 A. 2d 236 (1970) when we held that the Rule, which became effective on 1 October 1969, was not applicable to a case which had been at issue since 10 June 1969. Thomas H. Quinn, Inc. v. Realty Investment Co., Inc., 261 Md. 308, 274 A. 2d 352 (1971) which also challenged the validity of the Rule, was disposed of on procedural grounds. The present case puts…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Cooke v. CookeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
  2. Houston v. LLOYD'S CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE CORPORATIONCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
  3. Bullock v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1962
  4. Price v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1849
  5. The Caledonian Fire Ins. Co. v. TraubCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1897

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Davidson v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Bringe v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  3. Perkins v. EskridgeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  4. Pantazes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Andrews v. Governor of MarylandCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API