Legal Opinion

Houston v. LLOYD'S CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 17, 1965No. [No. 13, September Term, 1965.]PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcWilliams, J.

Availing themselves of the provisions of Maryland Rule 826 g 1 the parties hereto signed and filed with the clerk of the lower court the following:

“Lloyd’s Consumer Acceptance Corporation, Plaintiff, and Reed Houston and Catherine Houston, Defendants stipulate and agree under the provisions of Rule 826 g that the following is a statement of the case in lieu of pleadings and evidence: The Plaintiff brought its action in the Circuit Court for Baltimore County in assumpsit on July 14, 1964, and the Defendants filed a General Issue Plea and a Special Plea to the August Rule Day. Thereafter a…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Yakus v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. Singer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Alvey v. AlveyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
  4. United States v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Steuart v. Mayor of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1855

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Impala Platinum Ltd. v. Impala Sales (U.S.A.), Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  2. Murphy v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  3. Attorney General v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  4. Davis v. SlaterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2004
  5. Bringe v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1975

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API