Boyle v. Musser-Sauntry Land, Logging & Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Plaintiff, a citizen of Minnesota, recovered judgment against defendant, an Iowa corporation, in the district court for Washington county. Thereafter the Standard Lumber Company, a foreign corporation, brought an attachment suit in Iowa against this plaintiff and garnished defendant with respect to its indebtedness to this plaintiff. Plaintiff was not served with process in Iowa.
Read the full summary
Plaintiff, a citizen of Minnesota, recovered judgment against defendant, an Iowa corporation, in the district court for Washington county. Thereafter the Standard Lumber Company, a foreign corporation, brought an attachment suit in Iowa against this plaintiff and garnished defendant with respect to its indebtedness to this plaintiff. Plaintiff was not served with process in Iowa. Execution having been issued upon plaintiff’s judgment, the district court for Washington county, Williston, J., made an order to show cause why all proceedings in this action should not be stayed to await the…
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
Writ of certiorari directed to one of the judges of the district court of Washington county. From the record it appears that the plaintiff is a citizen of the state of Minnesota, while the defendant is an Iowa corporation carrying on an extensive logging and lumbering business in the state of Minnesota, managed by an agent residing in Stillwater, and with a “public office” in that city; such agent being appointed and such office located in accordance with the provisions of Laws 1899, c. 69. In an action between these parties arising out of a contract entered into in this state, judgment was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Wallace v. McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Harvey v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
- American Bank v. RollinsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. NashSupreme Court of Alabama · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Williamson v. FalkenhagenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1929
- Mercantile State Bank v. Farmers Home Bank of LilySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- McNish v. BurchSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. HaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
- Provo City v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1947