Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Haney

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided March 19, 1926No. 25,220PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

Action for the recovery of money wherein plaintiff attempted to garnishee the county of Mower upon a judgment against it and in favor of defendant. From an order discharging the garnishment plaintiff appeals.

Defendant’s judgment against the county of Mower was entered July 13, 1925, for $1,735.37. The garnishment summons was served July 18, 1925, and disclosure had August 25, 1925. The question is whether the garnishment was permissible under section 9361, G. S. 1923, which enumerates certain cases in which garnishment is not allowed. One of those negations is: “No person or corporation shall…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Home Insurance Co. of New York v. Peoria & Pekin Union Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Boyle v. Musser-Sauntry Land, Logging & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mid-Continent Pipe Line Co. v. WilkersonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API