Legal Opinion
McNish v. Burch
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided January 23, 1926No. File No. 5849PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the CourtGates, P. J.
A complete statement of the history of the litigation leading up to the bringing of this proceeding would present an extremely complicated state of facts, and would cover many pages. Suffice it to say that it grows out of the cases of Birken v. Hickey, 42 S. D. 472, 176 N. W. 137, and Birken v. Tapper, 45 S. D. 600, 189 N. W. 698, 24 A. L. R. 832, which see. In the latter case Birken secured a judgment against Tapper in the circuit court of Turner county, whieh we affirmed. Tapper deems himself damaged by Birken by reason of the unsuccessful attachments in Birken v. Hickey. He assigns said…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Shrewsbury v. TuftsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
- Tourville v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
- Wabash Railroad v. TourvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Franklin v. WardU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Rhode Island · 1822
- Birken v. HickeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1920
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Huron Holding Corp. v. Lincoln Mine Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941