Legal Opinion

Mercantile State Bank v. Farmers Home Bank of Lily

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 18, 1924No. 24,118PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolt, J.

Plaintiff, an incorporated bank of Minneapolis, this state, sued defendant, a bank at Lily, South Dakota, and garnished The First National Bank of Minneapolis. The facts deemed material were stipulated, and may be thus stated: Defendant, organized and existing under the laws of South Dakota, was doing a banking business at Lily, that state, and, on July 30, 1923, was insolvent. It had a balance of $4,176.60 in its deposit account with the First National Bank, when, on the day mentioned, because of its insolvency, the superintendent of banks of South Dakota, pursuant to its statutes, took…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Harvey v. Great Northern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1892
  2. Gilbert v. HewetsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  3. Brynjolfson v. OsthusNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1903
  4. Swedish-American National Bank v. BleeckerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
  5. Stevens v. TildenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hanson v. First State BankSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Baird v. MallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1930
  3. James River Bank v. BastianSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Pride v. Bank of Commerce of MilbankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API