Legal Opinion

People v. Rice

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 2, 1996No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Judg*972ment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that he was deprived of his statutory right to a speedy trial. We disagree. CPL 30.30 (1) (a) requires the People to announce their readiness for trial within six months of the commencement of a criminal proceeding. This proceeding was commenced on December 29, 1993, the date on which this Court remitted the matter for a new trial (People v Rice [appeal No. 1], 199 AD2d 1054). The People announced their readiness for trial on June 20, 1994, within six months of the commencement of the proceeding, and, thus, defendant’s statutory…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. People v. RiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  4. People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Biro v. Condé NastDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
  2. People v. RiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. People v. BlanceroNew York Supreme Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API