Legal Opinion
People v. Wilson
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 5, 1995PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
Defendant argues that the People violated his right to a speedy trial by failing to indicate readiness to proceed with his trial within "six months of the commencement of [defendant’s] criminal action” as required by CPL 30.30 (1) (a). The Appellate Division reversed defendant’s original conviction, remanded the case and ordered a new trial (156 AD2d 743). Subsequently, on defendant’s second appeal, the Appellate Division remitted the matter to County Court for a CPL 30.30 hearing (188 AD2d 671). After that…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. KendziaNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. WilsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by19 opinions
- People v. NelsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- People v. CrossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. ShermanCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2009
- People v. LindseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. RiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.