People v. Rice
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that his plea of guilty should be vacated because it was not knowingly, voluntarily and intelligently entered. By failing to move to withdraw his plea or to vacate the judgment of conviction, defendant has failed to preserve that contention for our review (see, People v Pellegrino, 60 NY2d 636; People v Anthony, 188 AD2d 477, Iv denied 81 NY2d 836; People v Jackson, 171 AD2d 883, Iv denied 78 NY2d 967). Moreover, the plea allocution does not cast significant doubt upon defendant’s guilt or otherwise raise questions concerning the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- People v. LopezNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- People v. PellegrinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. AnthonyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. RiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- People v. HillendaleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. HicksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- People v. SchneiderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- People v. GastonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- HICKS, RAYLAND L., PEOPLE vAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.