Legal Opinion
State v. Bonynge
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 9, 1990No. C6-89-578PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
Appellant challenges his conviction for one count of bestiality and four counts of aiding and abetting bestiality. Appellant argues first that the videotapes admitted into evidence were seized in violation of his first, fourth, and fourteenth amendment rights. Appellant also contends that the evidence at trial was insufficient to support his conviction of bestiality under Minn.Stat. § 609.294 (1988). We affirm.
FACTS
In June 1988, a police officer received information from a confidential, reliable informant. The informant stated that, while at appellant's residence…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Marron v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Marcus v. Search Warrant of PropertySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Oelschlager v. MagnusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. HulstCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- St. Louis County Attorney's Office v. Twenty-Four Thousand Six Hundred Forty-Three & 01/100 Dollars ($24,643.01) in Various Denominations of U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Dempski v. Commissioner of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Robert James Ward v. Commonwealth of VirginiaCourt of Appeals of Virginia · 2011