Legal Opinion
State v. Hulst
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 11, 1994No. C2-93-1148PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALITOWSKI, Judge.
Appellant Scott Allen Hulst seeks review of his gross misdemeanor conviction for refusing to submit to a chemical test in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subd. la (1990). Appellant contends the district court erred in considering appellant’s prior out-of-state license revocation.
FACTS
A police officer arrested appellant for refusing to submit to a chemical test in violation of Minn.Stat. § 169.121, subds. la and 3(c) (1990). Pursuant to the procedure approved in State v. Lothenbach, 296 N.W.2d 854, 856 (Minn.1980), appellant pleaded guilty and admitted that: (1) he…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. LothenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. CorbinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Northland Country Club v. Commissioner of TaxationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. Larson Transfer & Storage, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- State v. BonyngeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
3Cited by9 opinions
- Oelschlager v. MagnusonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- State v. MellettCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- St. Louis County Attorney's Office v. Twenty-Four Thousand Six Hundred Forty-Three & 01/100 Dollars ($24,643.01) in Various Denominations of U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- In Re RappCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- In Re the Welfare of E.S.C.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2007
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.