Legal Opinion

Edward L. Scharf in Behalf of Laura Patricia Scharf, a Minor v. United States Attorney General

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 29, 1979No. 77-2382PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:

Laura Patricia Scharf appeals from a district court order of summary judgment for the Government in an action she commenced for declaration of United States citizenship. 8 U.S.C. § 1503(a) and 28 U.S.C. § 2201. We determine that summary judgment was not proper, and we reverse.

Scharf brought an action for declaratory judgment of citizenship under Section 360 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952. 8 U.S.C. § 1503(a). 1 The complaint alleges that Scharf, who was born in Mexico, is entitled to a declaration of United States citizenship as the natural child of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
  3. Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. United States v. JanisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. M. E. DibbleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation E.J. Bartells Company, a Washington Corporation A.P. Green Refractories Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation, and Fibreboard Corp., a Delaware Corporation as Successor in Interest to the Paraffine Companies, Inc., Pabco Products, Inc., Fibreboard Paper Products Corporation, Plant Rubber & Asbestos Works and Plant Rubber & Asbestos Co., School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Keene Corporation, a New York Corporation Individually and as Successor in Interest to the Baldwin Ehret Hill Company, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Us Gypsum Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Owens-Corning Fiberglass Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Flintkote Company, a Delaware Corporation, School District No. 1j, Multnomah County, Oregon v. Acands, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Atlas Asbestos Company, Inc., a Canadian Corporation, and Armstrong Cork Company, Inc., a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. Charles E. Egger v. Harlan C. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
  3. Burch v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006
  4. Anthony J. Decintio v. Westchester County Medical Center County of Westchester, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
  5. Sergio E. Fonseca v. Sysco Food Services of Arizona, Inc., a Delaware For-Profit CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API