Legal Opinion

International-Great Northern R. v. Binford

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 1, 1925No. 4602PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALKER, Circuit Judge.

When the railroad lines and other properties of the International & Great Northern Railroad Company were placed by the court below in the hands of a receiver in 1908,'in a mortgage foreclosure suit, that company owed certain debts to a bank which thereafter were assigned to one of the appellees, the Concrete Investment Company, which is herein referred to as the Concrete Company. Claims asserted by interventions in that suit that those debts were entitled to priority over the claims of mortgagees and general creditors were rejected. Thereafter in 1913 the Concrete…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. Anderson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1918
  4. International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. Concrete Inv. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  5. Central Union Trust Co. of NY v. Anderson CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1925

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Cooperative Transit Co. v. West Penn Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1943
  2. International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. AdkinsDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1926
  3. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Continental Nat. Bank & Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  4. (HC) Bisel v. FisherDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
  5. Brian Llewellyn, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Cellco Partnership, et al.District Court, W.D. Washington · 2026

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API