Legal Opinion
(HC) Bisel v. Fisher
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 26, 2022No. 1:17-cv-00013Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREGORY EUGENE BISEL, Case No.: 1:17-cv-00013-DAD-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO INCLUDE LATE DISCOVERY 13 [Doc. 77] v. 14 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY MOTION FOR TEMPORARY 15 RAY FISHER, JR., et al., RESTRAINING ORDER AND STAY OF PAROLE CONDITIONS 16 Respondents. [Doc. 76] 17 [21-DAY DEADLINE] 18 19 Petitioner is a state parolee proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus 20 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 21 On October 4, 2021, Respondent filed an answer to the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Frederick G. Land v. George Deeds, Warden and Brian McKay Attorney General of the State of NevadaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Ralph R. Benson v. State of California, Peter Pitchess, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, and Leland Carter, Probation Officer of Los Angeles CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1964
- United States v. William D. Mett and Marvin L. WisemanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- International-Great Northern R. v. BinfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1925