Legal Opinion

International & G. N. Ry. Co. v. Adkins

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided July 17, 1926PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs, International & Great Northern Railway Company, defendant, and W. R. King and W. W. Collier, as sureties on its supersedeas bond entered in the Fifty-Seventh judicial district court of Bexar county, Tex., to stay the judgment of that court rendered against the defendant railway company, have filed an ancillary bill in equity No. 49 on the docket of this court, in which they seek to enjoin the defendants here, plaintiffs in the state court, from enforcing the judgment above mentioned, which has been affirmed by the highest court of the state on appeal.

Plain…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Kline v. Burke Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. US v. Don Fernando De La Maza Arredondo & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
  3. Lion Bonding & Surety Co. v. KaratzSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  4. Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  5. Wiswall v. SampsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1853

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brunk v. Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1933
  2. Cochrane v. W. F. Potts Son & Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1931
  3. Hatch v. Morosco Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1927
  4. Union Sulphur Co. v. Texas Gulf Sulphur Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1929
  5. Alford v. Modesto City School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API