Legal Opinion

Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. McIntosh

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1894No. 16,816PublishedCited by 45 opinions

From the Steuben Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.

— This action was brought by the appellee to recover damages for the death of his intestate at a railway crossing over a public highway. The accident was caused, as alleged, by the negligent construction of the crossing and by the negligent running of appellant’s train.

The jury returned a general verdict for the appellee, and also answers to interrogatories.

Of the errors assigned but one is discussed in the briefs of counsel, the overruling of appellant’s motion for a new trial.

Fault is first found with the instructions of the court. The second instruction requested by the appellee, and given…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Continental Improvement Co. v. SteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. Louisville, New Albany & Chicago Railway Co. v. BuckIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  3. State v. BerdettaIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Indiana, Bloomington & Western Railway Co. v. BarnhartIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. StoutIndiana Supreme Court · 1876

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Shultz v. Old Colony Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  2. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MillerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Reading Township v. TelferSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
  4. Treschman v. TreschmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1901
  5. New York, Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Hamlet Hay Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API